Construction Nightmares 3rd Edition

Be the first to review this product

$64.95

Our own mistakes make effective, though sometimes expensive lessons. Usually it's safer to learn from the mistakes of others, and a lot less expensive.



In this book you can read about the construction jobs from hell, and hopefully learn how to avoid them. Here you'll earn how others dealt with busts in plans, extas, delays, interference, scheduling, extra work, change orders, defective construction, inadequate supervision, and incompetent contractors and subs.

Weight 2.4600
ISBN 978-1-55701-603-4
Page Count 464
Author Arthur F. O'Leary and James Acret
Publisher BNI
Dimensions 8-1/2 x 11

Our own mistakes make effective, though sometimes expensive lessons. Usually it's safer to learn from the mistakes of others, and a lot less expensive.

In this book you can read about the construction jobs from hell, and hopefully learn how to avoid them. Here you'll earn how others dealt with busts in plans, extas, delays, interference, scheduling, extra work, change orders, defective construction, inadequate supervision, and incompetent contractors and subs.

Write Your Own Review

You're reviewing: Construction Nightmares 3rd Edition

Contents

Acknowledgements, xv

1, The Foolproof Construction Contract
An Attempt to Write a No-Extra Contract, 1
Points of Law
Who Pays for the Extra Work, 7

2, ABC Warehouse I
A Construction Defect, 9
Points of Law
Allen Gets a Cracked Slab, 15

3, ABC Warehouse II
Winding Up the Job, 19
Points of Law
Job Close-Out, 25

4, ABC Warehouse III
A Maintenance Failure, 27
Points of Law
Plugged Roof Drains, 33

5, The Tulare Job
A Costly Labor Relations Problem - A Disastrous Subcontract, 35
Points of Law
Problems with Labor Relations, 41

6, ABC Warehouse IV
The Mysterious Retaining Wall Collapse, 43
Points of Law
Retaining Wall Collapse, 51

7, ABC Warehouse V
Earthquake Damage or a Latent Defect?, 53
Points of Law
Glulam Beam Failure, 61

8, The Joint Venture
A Bonded Roofing Subcontract, 63
Points of Law
Choose Your Joint Venturer More Carefully Than Your Spouse, 69

9, Shangri-La Gardens
The Short Life of Eterna1 Waterproofing, 73
Points of Law
Intentional Misconduct, 81

10, ABC Warehouse VI
The Pressure Regulator Ordered by the Building Inspector, 83
Points of Law
Who Pays for the Pressure Regulator?, 87

11, Davren Effingwell dba Economy Home Improvement Company I
Who Protects the Owner? Conflicts of Interest, 89
Points of Law
The Dangers of Contracting With a Friend, 97

12, ABC Warehouse VII
Faulty Contractor Selection and Contract Adn1inistration, 99
Points of Law
Allen Hires His High School Buddy, 107

13, Davren Effingwell dba Economy Home Improvement Company II
Cleaning Up the Mess, 111
Points of Law
The Aftermath, 119

14, ABC Warehouse VIII
Shop Drawings Procedure, 121
Points of Law
Shop Drawings, Changes, Claims, and Dispute Resolution, 129

15, Venture Tower
Responsibility for Window Wall Leaking, 133
Points of Law
Fraudulent Shop Drawings, 143

16, PSI Creativity Center I
The Design and Bidding Phases, 147
Points of Law
A Difficult Client for an Architect, 155

17, PSI Creativity Center II
The Construction Period, 159
Points of Law
Quagmire Employs His Patient as a Contractor, 167

18, ABC Warehouse IX
Owner's Assignment of Subcontractor, 171
Points of Law
Allen Helps His Brother-in-Law, 179

19, ABC Warehouse X
Owner's Separate Contractor, 183
Points of Law
Allen Hires a Decorator, 193

20, Pacific Horizon I
Value Engineering: The Contract Negotiation Phase, 197
Points of Law
Selling the Job, 205

21, Pacific Horizon II
Value Engineering: The Construction Period, 209
Points of Law
The Construction Period, 217

22, Pacific Horizon III
Value Engineering: After Completion of Construction, 221
Points of Law
Living with the Building, 229

23, ABC Warehouse XI
Substitutions in Lieu of Specified Materials, 231
Points of Law
Substitutions, 237

24, Parc L'Cockaigne
Discovering the Cause of Construction Defects, 239
Points of Law
Condominium Defects Caused by Contractor Ignorance, 245

25, ABC Warehouse XII
A Corrupt Alliance - A Criminal Conspiracy, 247
Points of Law
Skullduggery and Corruption, 253

26, ABC Warehouse XIII
Home Improvements, 257
Points of Law
Allen's Deck - The Independent Contractor, 265

27, Utopian Villas
Keeping Costs Under Control, 267
Points of Law
Construction Documents for an Owner-Builder Developer, 277

28, The Chief Estimator
Getting the Job by Hook or by Crook, 279
Points of Law
The Crooked Estimator, 287

29, ABC Warehouse XIV
Allen's Tenant - Part I - The Hot Prospect, 291
Points of Law
Allen's Tenant - Part I - The Hot Prospect, 297

30, ABC Warehouse XV
Allen's Tenant - Part II - The Leasehold Improvements, 299
Points of Law
Allen's Tenant - Part II - The Leasehold Improvements, 303

31, ABC Warehouse XVI
Allen's Tenant - Part III - Living with the Tenant, 305
Points of Law
Allen's Tenant - Part III - Living with the Tenant, 309

32, ABC Warehouse XVII
Roofs Don't Last Forever, 311
Points of Law
Roofs Don't Last Forever, 321

33, Spartan Savings Bank
Uncovering and Correcting Defective Work - Who Pays?, 323
Points of Law
Uncovering and Correcting Defective Work - Who Pays?, 331

34, ABC Warehouse XVIII
The RME - Responsible Managing Employee of a Contractor, 333
Points of Law
The RME - Carl Goes into the Contracting Business, 339

35, Malibu Riviera Badminton and Swimming Club
The Hazards of Innovation, 341
Points of Law
Definition of Architectural Malpractice, 347

36, ABC Warehouse XIX - Alice's Coffee Shop
Part One - An Exciting New Life for Alice, 349
Points of Law
Late Completion and Liquidated Damages, 355

37, ABC Warehouse XX - Alice's Coffee Shop
Part Two - Cleaning Up the Chaos, 357
Points of Law
Owner Must Pay for Changes, 365

38, ABC Warehouse XXI - Alice's Coffee Shop
Part Three - Construction Coordination, 367
Points of Law
Mechanics Lien Rights, 371

39, ABC Warehouse XXII - A New House for Alice
Part One - Finding the Property, 373
Points of Law
Read Before Signing a Contract, 379

40, ABC Warehouse XXIII - A New House for Alice
Part Two - Hiring an Architect, 381
Points of Law
Architects and Contractors Must Be Carefully Selected, 387

41, ABC Warehouse XXIV - A New House for Alice
Part Three - Finding a Contractor, 389
Points of Law
Construction Administration Is Not for Amateurs, 393

42, ABC Warehouse XXV - A New House for Alice
Part Four - The Construction Period, 395
Points of Law
The High Cost of Hiring the Wrong Contractor, 399

43, ABC Warehouse XXVI - A New House for Alice
Part Five - Salvaging the Remains, 401
Points of Law
Best to Hire a Construction Lawyer, 405

44, Blame the Window Washers
Maintenance Failure or Building Defect?, 407
Points of Law
Who Pays? Owner, Contractor, or Architect?, 417

45, ABC Warehouse XXVII- Expansion into Tucson Part One
A Perfect Contractor, 419
Points of Law
Legal Advice for Allen and Carl, 425

46, ABC Warehouse XXVIII- Expansion into Tucson Part Two
Dumping the Contractor, 427
Points of Law
Owner and Contractor Want Out, 433

47, ABC Warehouse XXIX - A Little Freshening Up Part One
Finding and Hiring the Right Painter, 435
Points of Law
Unfamiliar Contracts Must be Read Before Signing, 441

48, ABC Warehouse XXX - A Little Freshening Up Part Two
The Painting Contractor, 443
Points of Law
Insurance and Mechanics Liens, 449

Index - Stories, 451
Index - Points of Law, 457

Chapter 1

THE FOOLPROOF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
An Attempt to Write a No-Extra Contract

Baker/Doyle was a thriving construction company, highly experienced in the supermarket field. In addition to over 50 market projects they had completed for customers, they had built and still owned 15 under their investment subsidiary, Baker/Doyle Properties. All 15 were on long-term leases to Frugalmart Stores, Inc, one of the more stable retail operators. There was little that the partners, Abel Baker and Charles Doyle, didn't know about supermarket construction.

The Frugalmart buildings were typically 150 feet by 180 feet, 27,000 square feet, with a generous loading dock area and a 135 car landscaped parking area.

In early October 1992, Abel Baker had spotted a suitable piece of recently cleared land, about 100,000 square feet, in a district where Frugalmart was interested in locating. The real estate broker readily disclosed the existence of several feet of old fill soil over most of the site. This did not bother Baker/Doyle, as they would simply dig a test hole at each of the four comers of the proposed building location and allow for the estimated extra cost of deeper foundations.

Upon obtaining permission to dig the test holes, they asked Ivan Jenson, their excavation contractor, to send over a man and a backhoe to sink the four holes. The site was more or less level and they recorded the depths of fill at the four comers as 2 feet at the NW comer, 5 feet at the NE comer, 3 feet at the SW comer, and 6 feet at the SE comer. They logically assumed that it would be a straight line, more or less, between the four measured natural earth levels.

After allowing for their estimate of extra foundation expense, the land cost was still reasonable so they optioned it for 60 days to allow time to finalize a lease with Frugalmart.

Negotiations with the leasing executive at Frugalmart resulted in a satisfactory long term lease, so Baker/Doyle properties exercised their option to purchase the property on November 23, 1992. On the same day they visited and hired Flynn & Hill, Architects and Engineers, who had designed all their previous supermarkets.

The partnership of Eugene Flynn, Architect and Gerald Hill, Structural Engineer had a well-earned reputation for designing attractive and economical supermarkets and their work was acceptable to the major supermarket tenants. They were known among their peers for design innovation and competent documentation.


At their first meeting with Baker/Doyle, Gene and Gerry insisted on a boundary and topographic survey of the property and a foundation investigation. Charlie Doyle said okay on the land survey but was not keen on the soil testing. He rationalized, "We already know about the fill and its depth so why waste good money on soil testing?"

Gerry Hill advised, "If we don't have a soil test then we'll have to assume that the maximum allowable pressure on the natural soil is 1500 pounds per square foot. But if we obtain a soil test it might disclose a higher allowable value and you could save some money on concrete and reinforcing."

Doyle said they had built on a similar site nearby and the soil test substantiated a 2000 pounds per square foot value, "So let's use 2000 psf."

Hill replied, "No, Charlie, we can use only 1500 psf unless we see a soil test. The Building Department will take the same position. Although 1500 psf is fairly conservative, we'd be still happier with a soil test." Charlie Doyle authorized the land survey but not the foundation investigation.

So Flynn & Hill designed the building. Baker/Doyle was satisfied with the design sketches and submitted them to Frugalmart who promptly approved them. Flynn & Hill proceeded with the construction drawings and specifications on December 15, 1992. On the foundation plan and details they showed the wall and column footings extending down through the fill soil and 18 inches into the natural soil. The structural engineers used 1500 pounds per square foot soil pressure for designing the footings. On the foundation plan they placed a note saying: "All footings shall be founded 18 inches into natural undisturbed soil. Minimum bearing capacity shall be 1500 pounds per square foot."

Flynn & Hill was hired only for design, production of the construction documents, and obtaining the building permit but not for administration of the construction contract. Baker/Doyle felt they could handle the contract administration themselves. After all, they reasoned, they were experienced general contractors and it was their own building. Field inspection or consultation, if any is needed, would be on an as-called-for basis.

The architects and engineers worked diligently, finished the plans and specifications, and applied for the building permit on February 15, 1993. It was issued on Apri12, 1993.
Baker/Doyle was quite busy at the time with three supermarkets and two warehouses then under construction, tying up their best superintendents. They didn't feel they could do their own job justice and complete it on time to satisfy their commitment to Frugalmart. So they decided to hire Lee-Noonan Constructors, experienced supermarket builders, to build it for them. Before going into the contracting business together, Kenneth Lee had been an estimator with Baker/Doyle, and Michael Noonan had been a lawyer in a large law firm specializing in construction industry matters. The partners of the two contracting firms were on a friendly competitive basis.

They negotiated a contract. Baker/Doyle said they wanted a lump sum proposal including a fair profit. Both firms were experienced in supermarket building and nobody knew any more about the business than they. The plans and specs were excellent, they had the permit in hand, so they expected no building department corrections. They knew the depth of fill, so the exact price could be determined They agreed there were to be no extras. Both firms accepted this simple concept.
Baker/Doyle would be ideal customers, since they would not be unreasonable like most of the other customers of both firms. Everything would go smoothly. There would be no justification for any extras. They would prepare the contract on this basis. Lee-Noonan's skilled estimating staff carefully estimated all the quantities, called in their most trusted subcontractors, and computed their best overall price. Meanwhile, Baker/Doyle had their own estimating department figure the job. Upon detailed analysis of the Lee-Noonan price proposal, they felt that it was reasonable and they were happy to accept it. The price was right and they felt comfortable with Lee-Noonan.

Michael Noonan prepared the contract. He used Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor (where the basis of payment is a Stipulated Sum), Twelfth Edition, AlA Document A1O1, 1987, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, Fourteenth Edition, AlA Document A20 1, 1987, and incorporated Flynn & Hill's construction drawings and specifications. In A1Ol, among other additional provisions, he added a clause that said, "It is contemplated between the parties hereto that there will be no extra costs arising from the work of this contract." This would guarantee a profit for Lee-Noonan and a stable price for Baker/Doyle. It was foolproof How could anything go wrong?

At 5:00 PM on Friday, April 23, 1993, the four contractors met in Baker/Doyle's offices. They discussed the contract and their mutual pleasure on entering a contract with knowledgeable parties on both sides. All conditions were perfect. There should be no problem in meeting the time schedule as there would be no owner's changes to hold up the job and no extras.
Charlie Doyle laughingly reminded Ken and Mike that Baker/Doyle would be watching them so there is no point in claiming changed conditions or constructive acceleration or impact or any others of the sometimes specious contractor excuses for extras. The four good humored contractors signed the contract and opened a bottle of specially chilled champagne. After lavish toasts, sincere congratulations, and pleasant banter, they went out to dinner, guests of Lee-Noonan Constructors. Ken and Mike were truly proud of being trusted so implicitly by their respected senior competitors, Baker/Doyle. Spirits were high and all were euphoric with optimism and the warmth of mutual respect and trust.

A little over a week later, on Monday, May 3, 1993, Lee-Noonan started mobilizing the job in the field One of their best superintendents, Oran Peters, was available and was assigned to the job. He immediately got the site fenced, a job office, telephone, and chemical toilets installed, and temporary water and electrical facilities in place. He had previously ordered a large sign identifying the Frugalmart project with the names of Lee-Noonan, Baker/Doyle, and Flynn & Hill prominently displayed, and it was now sturdily installed.

Exercising caution, Lee-Noonan hired Quality Engineering, who had done the land survey, to locate and mark the property lines, layout the building on the site, and establish a working bench mark for construction and grade levels. Ivan Jenson, low bidder on excavating, had moved onto the site with earth moving equipment and trucks. After completing the general site grading in less than a week, they started excavating for wall and column footings on Monday, May 10.

They dug down to the original undisturbed earth levels and continued on down a minimum of 18 inches more into the virgin soil. The fill depths proved to be exactly as predicted. After leveling off the bottoms of all excavations and cleaning out the loose earth, they started setting and tying the steel reinforcing in the footings. Dowels were set for overlapping with the masonry wall reinforcing to come above. Meanwhile, the steel column bolt templates arrived from the steel fabricator. By Friday they were ready for building department inspection of the footing excavation and reinforcing called for on the following Monday. After Monday's approval, they would start pouring the concrete footings on the following day, right on schedule.

On Monday, May 24, at 9:00 AM the Building Department Inspector, Ray Scott, showed up to look at the work in process. He had already briefly reviewed the drawings in his City Hall office the previous afternoon in preparation for this inspection. He introduced himself to Oran Peters and asked to look at the Inspection Record. They walked over to the footing excavation, paced solemnly around the entire building perimeter, then went inside to look at the two large isolated column pad excavations. The jobsite was neat, the work looked good, and Oran Peters was proud of it He wondered what the inspector could find to criticize without nit-picking. Scott picked up an 8- foot length of #4 rebar and, using it, prodded the bottom of the excavation in various places. He commented, "It seems a little spongy. I'm not sure this soil would test up to 1500 psf. I may be wrong. Maybe it's okay. But I can't approve it You'll have to get the soil tested to prove it's good for 1500 psf loading." Oran didn't know what to say and after some feeble defense of the soil, he gave up. Scott filled in a red tag and told Peters not to do any more work until the soil value was resolved between the structural engineer and the building department He apologized to the deflated superintendent and left.

As soon as the inspector drove off, Peters telephoned the Lee-Noonan office and asked for Mike. Noonan's secretary came on the line to say he was busy in a conference. Oran ordered her to interrupt him. "This is a disaster!" Seconds later, Mike was on the line. Oran spilled out the whole story, finishing with, "Now we're closed down. What'll I do?" Mike told him to secure the site and come on in to the office.

Mike immediately dialed Baker/Doyle and got Charlie Doyle on the line. "The job's closed down by the Building Department Something's wrong with the soil. We gotta get a soil report!"

Charlie snapped, "Who sez?"

"Our superintendent, Oran Peters, just called and said the Building Inspector closed down the job and demanded a soil report. I thought you guys had all the necessary engineering and approvals. What'll we do now?"

"I'm sure everything's all right I'll look into it, Mike, and call you right back!" They hung up, both concerned and puzzled.

Charlie quickly briefed his partner Abe on Mike's phone call and Abe anxiously hovered while Charlie dialed Flynn & Hill's number. He asked for Gerry Hill and recapped the Noonan phone call. Gerry said, "Come over here this afternoon after lunch, say 2 o'clock I'll have talked to Oran Peters and the Building Department before you get here."

Abe and Charlie arrived at Flynn & Hill's office promptly at 2 o'clock. Hill said that he'd talked to the job superintendent and one of the Building Department engineers about the soil problem. He explained that the Building Inspector, Ray Scott, had been prodding the natural bearing soil and that he felt that it might not test up to 1500 pounds per square foot Hill explained, "This isn't a scientific method of testing soil, but now that he's raised the issue there's nothing left to do but order a soil investigation."

Charlie asked, "Can they do this to us? They approved the plans and issued the building permit! I thought we were home free!"

Abe, concurring, chimed in, "Yeah! Home free!"

Gerry replied, "There's no point in moaning about it. The Building inspector is just being cautious and is within his rights. Let's call Tom Usher at GeoPhysical Technology and see how soon they can take some in situ soil samples. After we know some facts we can analyze the situation. Until then we're just irresponsibly speculating." The contractor partners nodded their assent.

So Gerry Hill telephoned GeoPhysical Technology and Tom Usher said he could take the samples in about 3 weeks. Hill earnestly explained the crucial urgency and got Tom to agree to take samples tomorrow, Tuesday, May 25, have tentative results late the next day, and a final report for the Building Department on Wednesday, June 2. Tom said this was ultrafast service for an old mend. GeoPhysical's fee arrangements were acceptable to Abe and Charlie. Gerry thanked Tom and told him go ahead.

Charlie said, "Maybe we should have gotten soil tests before the design was started?"

Gerry Hill reminded him, "Perhaps you've forgotten that was what I recommended at the time?"

"Yeah, I remember. You should have talked us into it!"

The preliminary soil report was hand delivered to Flynn & Hill's at 4:30 PM on Wednesday as Tom Usher had promised. It indicated that the soil is good for only 1350 psf but would be increased to 2000 by digging 2 feet deeper. Gerry Hill called another meeting with Baker and Doyle for Thursday, 10:00 AM, May 27.

Gerry started by showing Abe and Charlie the preliminary report and explaining the practical consequences. "It appears that the natural soil near the surface isn't very good. Although it would support the building if we merely widened the footings 10 or 15 percent, we'd have to alter the reinforcing to take care of the extra footing overhang. Alternatively we could deepen the excavations two feet to get into the higher value soil. In either case the reinforcing will have to be removed to redo the earthwork.

"In my opinion, it would be a better building to use the second option and found the footings in better soil. This would also entail adding 2 feet to the height of the exterior walls and a concrete pedestal at each of the interior columns."

After considerable discussion the partners decided that they should take Gerry's advice and build the better way. After all, they reasoned, they would own the building for a long time.

They authorized Flynn & Hill to proceed with preparation of the additional calculations and revised drawings. They'd submit the revisions to the Building Department when the final soils report arrived next Wednesday.

The final report was hand delivered to Flynn & Hill at 10:00 AM, Wednesday. It substantiated the earlier preliminary results. At 2:00 PM, Hill brought the whole redesign package to the Building Department and went over it with a senior engineering plan checker. He said to leave it so he could study it more carefully and review it with his superior. If it was okay, he would issue a revised permit tomorrow morning. At 10 AM, June 3, Hill picked up the approval and revised permit upon payment of the supplementary fee. He then delivered it to Baker/Doyle's offices.

Charlie Doyle had the revised drawings and Building Department approval delivered to Lee-Noonan's offices before noon. Lee-Noonan reorganized the job and was back in full production the next morning, Friday, June 4. They removed most of the reinforcing that day. On Monday, June 7, they started deepening all the excavations, and by Thursday, June 10, they were ready to reinstall the reinforcing. However, this time they had made arrangements to have one of Tom Usher's engineering geologists on hand to examine the soil at the bottom of the excavations and approve it before replacing the reinforcing steel. The soil was okay and they commenced reinstalling the rebar.

By Monday, June 14, they were ready for inspector Scott to re-examine their work before pouring the concrete. Early on Tuesday, June 15, Scott approved the excavations and reinforcing so they were able to pour concrete on Wednesday, June 16. Lee-Noonan had previously alerted XYZ Ready mix that they wanted prompt service and they got all the footings poured that day.

Fortunately, the job continued smoothly from there on. No more glitches. They'd lost 22 days.

Life was back to normal at Baker/Doyle. All their jobs were running smoothly and they'd heard no more bad news from Lee-Noonan's Frugalmart job. Then, on Monday, June 28, a Lee-Noonan invoice arrived in the mail. It was for the extra costs of removing and replacing the reinforcing steel, deepening the excavations, disposing of the excess earth, the additional masonry wall height, the concrete column pedestals, standby costs of closing down the job for 22 days, overhead and profit, a total of $39,855.

Charlie, his face white, took the bill into Abe's office, threw it on the desk and flung himself into a chair. Abe read the bill and sat there with his mouth agape. The two partners were incredulous and outraged. The contract, clearly, was to have no extras. Everyone had agreed to this concept. Lee-Noonan is trying to screw us. They've got no ethics. Charlie then telephoned Mike and let him have it. The old camaraderie seemed to have vanished. Mike said it would be better to meet and talk it over, calmly and rationally. Why not meet at Flynn & Hill's office? So Mike volunteered to set it up.

The next afternoon at 4 o'clock the four partners of the two contracting firms were formally seated on opposite sides of the large table in Flynn & Hill's conference room. Architect Flynn was sitting at one end with Engineer Hill facing at the opposite end.

The contractors were poised, alert, grim faced, and quiet, so Gene Flynn tentatively assumed control of the meeting.
Gerry Hill and Mike Noonan were at the ready with note pads and pens.

Gene started out by saying that Flynn & Hill has not been retained for contract administration nor dispute resolution services. He and Gerry now are just trying to accommodate old mends.

At this point, Charlie interrupted to say, "This'll be very simple. We have a contract here, signed by Lee-Noonan and Baker/Doyle, that says no extras! Now we've received a billing from Lee-Noonan for an extra 40 thousand dollars. Signed contracts don't seem to mean anything to some people." Abe concurred, "Yeah, some people!"

Gene, feeling his way, suggested that both sides should state their viewpoint. "Mike, please explain Lee-Noonan's position on this."

Mike Noonan cleared his throat and began, "We admit that the contract contemplated no extras. But what occurred was clearly not anticipated by either party. The soil turned out to have less bearing capacity than Baker/Doyle thought it had.
It's their soil, not ours. The costs we billed were honestly incurred. We should be reimbursed in full for all our costs and expenses plus a reasonable profit."

Gene nodded to Charlie, who calmly replied, "We don't question the honesty of the billing. That's not the issue. We had a no extra agreement. No extras means no extras. We talked it over and agreed to it. That's all there is to it."

Abe sagely nodded agreement and added, "We owe nothing."

Gene Flynn, always optimistic, suggested that maybe this could be settled by compromising the bill on a 50/50 basis. All four contractors reacted vehemently, objecting. .

Mike Noonan replied, "No. We spent the money. It's a fair bill and we'll collect it in full."

Charlie said, "No extras. We owe nothing!"

Gerry Hill suggested that they take a short recess for a cup of coffee. He arranged for coffee to be served and he and Gene went into an adjoining office, closing the door. They discussed the possibility of recommending mediation but didn't think it would be likely to succeed, since both parties wanted all or nothing. They felt that the spirit of compromise required in a mediation was completely lacking in this case. They decided to recommend arbitration as a more practical procedure under the circumstances.

The six reassembled in the conference room and closed the door. Resuming the chair, Gene invited suggestions. Abe immediately suggested where Lee-Noonan could put their bill. No one rose to the bait.

Mike Noonan reminded them that the Frugalmart contract included an arbitration provision in Article 4.5 of the AIA general conditions, AIA Document A201. He also pointed out that all references to the architect in the dispute resolution process in Articles 4.3 and 4.4 had been stricken as Flynn & Hill had not been retained for those services. Therefore, the architect's decision was not required as a precedent to arbitration.

Gene urged that the dispute be submitted to arbitration and let an experienced construction arbitrator decide the matter. After considerable discussion, the two firms of contractors agreed that this would be the only satisfactory course. They would wait until the end of the construction and submit this single issue for a final and binding decision.

Kenneth Lee said, "In the meanwhile, we might as well shake hands, be mends, and build the building."

Abe laconically replied, "Right."

Construction Nightmares
Jobs from Hell and How to Avoid Them
By Arthur F. O'Leary FAIA, MRIAI & James Acret ESQ.

Construction Nightmares: Jobs From Hell and How To Avoid Them narrates actual jobs gone bad from the world of construction dealing with busts in plans, extras, delays, interference, scheduling, extra work, change orders, defective construction, inadequate supervision, and incompetent contractors. In other words - just about every problem in the construction industry.

After Arthur F. O'Leary tells you what happened on the job, what went wrong and how it went wrong, James Acret provides an in-depth legal analysis and the probable outcome of the potential arbitration or lawsuit. The analysis provided deals with contracts, cancellation of contracts, walking off the job, removing a contractor from the job, responsibility of the bonding company, mechanics liens, insurance covers, arbitration, mediation, lawsuits, important provisions in construction contracts, responsibilities of the architect and the owner, liability for construction defects and much more. Construction Nightmares also provides you with the practical information you need to handle problems on the job.

Arthur F. O'Leary, FAIA, MRIAI, a 40 year construction project veteran, has served as an arbitrator and consultant on more than 300 industry litigations and has written, lectured, and published extensively in over 40 years of professional activity.

James Acret ESQ., has practiced construction law for over four decades. In his years of service to the construction industry, he has represented numerous contractors, architects, engineers, owners, developers and sureties. James was a member of the committee that rewrote the California Mechanics Lien Law in 1969 and is considered the "Dean of Construction Lawyers." He is the author of several legal publications.